Harvey Weinstein’s retrial begins with new allegations that could reshape the case that helped launch the #MeToo movement, even as his defense team claims the cultural tide has turned in his favor.

At a Glance

  • Weinstein faces a New York retrial after his 2020 conviction was overturned due to “egregious” judicial rulings and prejudicial testimony
  • The case includes a new complainant who wasn’t part of the original trial, adding to previous accusations from Jessica Mann and Miriam Haley
  • Jury selection is underway with the trial expected to last approximately one month
  • Weinstein has received support from conservative figures like Candace Owens and Joe Rogan
  • He continues to maintain all interactions were consensual while battling health issues including chronic myeloid leukemia

New Trial Underway After Overturned Conviction

Harvey Weinstein returns to court for a retrial of his #MeToo-era case after New York’s highest court overturned his 2020 conviction. The Court of Appeals ruled that the original trial judge made critical errors that prejudiced the jury against Weinstein, particularly by allowing testimony from women whose allegations weren’t part of the formal charges. The decision was controversial, with dissenting opinions expressing concern about the impact on future sexual assault cases. The retrial will not reference the previous proceedings, which have been legally declared invalid.

Watch coverage here.

Weinstein faces charges of criminal sexual act and third-degree rape involving incidents from 2006 and 2013. The prosecution has added a new charge from a previously untried accuser, while some charges from the original trial, including predatory sexual assault, are not being pursued again after initial acquittals. The disgraced Hollywood producer also continues to battle a separate rape conviction in Los Angeles, which he is currently appealing.

New Complainant and Key Allegations

The retrial centers on accusations from three women, including Jessica Mann and Miriam Haley from the original trial, plus a new complainant who came forward shortly before Weinstein’s first trial. Haley previously testified that Weinstein forcibly performed oral sex on her in 2006 at his New York apartment. During her testimony, she recalled telling him, “No, please don’t do this, I don’t want it.” Mann testified about alleged assaults in 2013, describing a complex relationship marked by manipulation.

Weinstein’s defense team has strongly objected to the inclusion of the new complainant, arguing that the delay in bringing forward these charges is prejudicial to their client. They’ve also secured some legal victories in preliminary hearings, with the judge making various rulings on admissible evidence and testimony. One key ruling allows witnesses to use the word “force” when describing alleged encounters with Weinstein, which the defense had attempted to restrict.

Changing Cultural Landscape

Weinstein’s legal team believes public attitudes toward the #MeToo movement have shifted significantly since his original trial. His publicist, Juda Engelmayer, has characterized the case in stark terms: “It’s a social justice witch-hunt.” Meanwhile, Weinstein himself has publicly thanked conservative commentators who have supported him, indicating a strategy that seeks to frame the case within broader cultural debates about due process and the court of public opinion.

“I want to take a moment to sincerely thank Candace Owens for believing in me and helping me reach millions of new supporters, and to Joe Rogan for amplifying that support even further” Weinstein said recently.

The retrial occurs amid a changing landscape for high-profile sexual misconduct cases. Bill Cosby’s conviction was previously overturned on procedural grounds, and Sean “Puffy” Combs faces his own legal challenges. These developments have raised questions about the lasting impact of the #MeToo movement in securing legal accountability for alleged sexual misconduct by powerful figures. Throughout all proceedings, Weinstein has maintained that his interactions were consensual.

Health Concerns and Trial Timeline

Weinstein’s deteriorating health continues to be a factor in the proceedings. The 72-year-old suffers from chronic myeloid leukemia and diabetes, with recent appearances showing him using a walker and appearing physically diminished. Despite these challenges, the trial is moving forward with jury selection currently underway. Court officials anticipate the proceedings will last approximately one month, significantly shorter than many complex criminal trials.

The retrial represents a critical moment for both the prosecution’s effort to hold Weinstein accountable and for the defense’s argument that procedural fairness was sacrificed in the original proceedings. Legal experts are closely watching how the judge will navigate the complex evidentiary issues that led to the overturning of the original conviction, while ensuring the current trial meets constitutional standards for a fair proceeding.