Ukrainians remain skeptical as Vladimir Putin’s proposed ceasefire appears to be more of a strategic move than a genuine gesture of peace.
At a Glance
- Putin declared a three-day ceasefire from May 8 to May 10, commemorating the Soviet victory in WWII.
- The Kremlin warned Ukraine of consequences if it breaches the ceasefire.
- Ukraine rejected the ceasefire, advocating for a longer peace agreement.
- The announcement coincided with reports of foreign troops aiding Russia.
Putin’s Three-Day Ceasefire Proposal
Vladimir Putin announced a 72-hour ceasefire in the ongoing conflict with Ukraine, slated for May 8 to May 10. This coincides with the 80th anniversary of the Soviet victory in WWII. Despite the symbolic framing, many in Kyiv see this move as another ploy rather than a sincere step towards peace. The Kremlin’s ultimatum to Ukraine—to follow suit or face consequences—only deepens the skepticism.
The White House is pushing for a permanent ceasefire, but finds itself frustrated by the ongoing hostilities from both sides. While the gesture is being packaged as an effort towards diplomacy, Ukrainian President Zelenskyy has been clear: a single weekend will not suffice. A longer, 30-day ceasefire is necessary for meaningful diplomatic talks and genuine peace efforts.
Skepticism and Distrust
Ukraine’s past experiences with Russian commitment—or lack thereof—to ceasefires fuels its reluctance. During a previous Easter truce, Russia was accused of violations, leading many Ukrainians to see the latest proposal as no different. With past violations still fresh, Zelenskyy suggested the ceasefire serves more to protect the spectacle of Russia’s Victory Day parade than to save lives.
“For some reason, everyone is supposed to wait for May 8 and only then have a cease-fire to ensure calm for Putin during the parade.” – Volodymyr Zelenskyy
Russia’s recent activities, including missile strikes, have only underscored Ukraine’s distrust. Adding fuel to the fire, reports have emerged that North Korean troops are fighting alongside Russian forces, suggesting Putin’s call for a ceasefire might just be a cover for further strategic gains while domestic eyes are turned towards the parade.
International Reactions and Implications
The proposed ceasefire, being the first full one since the onset of the conflict, raises questions on its underlying motives. Moscow’s expectations for peace terms include the recognition of its annexation of Crimea and control over other Ukrainian territories. As anticipated, these conditions remain sticking points for Ukraine and the international community.
“I was very disappointed that missiles were [launched] by Russia. I want [Putin] to stop shooting, sit down and sign a deal.” – Donald Trump
The U.S. administration’s frustration grows as efforts to broker a durable peace appear stagnant amid Russia’s continuous demands. The temporary ceasefire, although a glimmer of hope for some, does little to instill confidence without a permanent resolution and fair political negotiations.
