The CIA has been collecting DNA from world leaders to develop personalized bioweapons while simultaneously manipulating elections – all under the watchful eye of an Arizona State University president with deep intelligence ties.
At a Glance
- U.S. intelligence agencies reportedly collect DNA from foreign leaders for potential creation of personalized bioweapons
- The cost of genetic manipulation tools has plummeted, making dangerous bio-design accessible to many
- Independent researcher links CIA to biowarfare, genetic engineering, digital surveillance, and election interference
- Arizona State University President Michael Crow, also chairman of In-Q-Tel (CIA’s venture capital firm), identified as a central figure
DNA Collection and Personalized Bioweapons: The CIA’s New Frontier
The U.S. government has reportedly been collecting DNA samples from world leaders while simultaneously taking extraordinary measures to protect President Obama’s genetic material. This alarming revelation points to a disturbing reality: the intelligence community appears to be positioning itself to exploit advances in biotechnology for targeting specific individuals. Unlike traditional weapons of mass destruction, these personalized bioweapons would attack only those with particular genetic markers, leaving no evidence of foul play. The technology to create such weapons is advancing rapidly, with costs plummeting and accessibility expanding – creating a perfect storm for covert operations.
The democratization of biological knowledge has created a dangerous new reality where genetic engineering capabilities once restricted to advanced laboratories are now within reach of numerous actors. Online resources, second-hand equipment, and DIY bio-communities have emerged worldwide. What’s most concerning is that this technological revolution is happening with virtually no international oversight or regulation. While the U.S. government frantically collects and protects genetic information of key figures, they appear oblivious to – or perhaps complicit in – the rising tide of bioweapon capabilities being developed in their own backyard.
The Intelligence Community’s Biowarfare and Election Manipulation
Independent researcher Kristen Williamson has connected some deeply disturbing dots between the CIA and what she describes as “wild projects that will utterly transform life on Earth.” These aren’t just theoretical concerns but rather active programs involving biowarfare, genetic engineering, total digital surveillance, and even election irregularities. The implications are staggering – an intelligence apparatus operating beyond constitutional restraints, potentially manipulating both biology and democracy. The common thread connecting these seemingly disparate threats? Power consolidation through technological domination, with the American public kept deliberately in the dark.
“The CIA and the U.S. intelligence community are linked to wild projects that will utterly transform life on Earth if not stopped involving biowarfare, genetic engineering, total digital surveillance, and even election irregularities, explained independent researcher Kristen Williamson in this interview on Behind The Deep State with The New American magazine’s Alex Newman.” – Kristen Williamson.
At the center of this web sits Michael Crow, an individual whose positioning couldn’t be more strategic if it were designed by a thriller novelist. As both President of Arizona State University and Chairman of In-Q-Tel (the CIA’s venture capital arm), Crow straddles the worlds of academia and intelligence in a unique and powerful way. This dual role puts him at the nexus of cutting-edge research and classified intelligence operations – a combination that should concern every American who values transparency in government. Williamson’s research suggests Crow’s influence extends into areas that directly impact national elections and biological security.
The Terrifying Technical Reality
The technological underpinnings of these threats are advancing at breakneck speed. The cost of sequencing human genomes has fallen from billions to mere thousands of dollars. Bio-design capabilities that were once science fiction are now being crowdsourced through competitions and online platforms. What’s particularly chilling is how these capabilities could be weaponized against specific genetic profiles – including those of political leaders. A hypothetical scenario outlined by experts describes a virus designed to target a U.S. president using his personal DNA, triggering fatal cardiac arrest that would appear natural.
“As George Church, a geneticist at Harvard, explains, this is what is now happening in personalized medicine.” – George Church.
The expertise once contained within elite institutions has escaped into the wild. Gordon Moore’s famous prediction about computing power doubling every two years has found a parallel in biotechnology, where capabilities advance exponentially while costs plummet. This democratization of previously restricted knowledge creates an unprecedented national security challenge – one that our intelligence agencies appear more interested in exploiting than containing. If the allegations about CIA involvement in election manipulation are added to this biological threat matrix, we’re looking at an unelected power structure with capabilities to fundamentally alter both our biology and our democracy.
